# 8.4 Referenties

Ackoff, R. L. (2004). Transforming the systems movement. Retrieved from <https://thesystemsthinker.com/transforming-the-systems-movement/>

Berkhout, F., Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2003). *Socio-technical regimes and transitions contexts. SPRU.* University of Sussex, Science and Technology Policy Research.

Checkland, P. (1999). *Systems Thinking, Systems Practice.* Chichester: John Wiley.

De Sitter, L. U. (1994). *Synergetisch produceren: Human Resources Mobilisation in de produktie: een inleiding in structuurbouw.* Assen, Nederland: Koninklijke van Gorcum B.V.

Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case study. *Research Policy, 31*(8-9), 1257-1274.

Geels, F. W. & Schot, J. **(**&#x32;007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. *Research Policy*, *36*(3), 399-417.

Grin, J., Rotmans, J., & Schot, J. W. (2010). *Transitions to sustainable development: New directions in the study of long term transformative change.* (Routledge studies in sustainability transitions; Vol. 1). New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change. *Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74*(4), 413-432.

Hummels, C. C. M., Trotto, A., Peeters, J. P. A., Levy, P., Alves Lino, J., & Klooster, S. (2019). Design research and innovation framework for transformative practices. In: *Strategy for change* (pp. 52-76). Glasgow: Glasgow Caledonian University.

Irwin, T. (2015). Transition design: a proposal for a new area of design practice, study, and research. *Design and Culture, 7*(2), 229-246.

Jones, P. (2014). Systemic Design Principles for Complex Social Systems. In G. Metcalf (Ed.), *Social Systems and Design* (Vol. 1, pp. 91-128). Tokyo: Springer.

Kemp, R., Schot, J. & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. *Technology analysis & strategic management*, *10*(2), 175-198.

Loorbach, D. (2014). To Transition! Governance Panarchy in the New Transformation, DRIFT, Erasmus University of Rotterdam. Available online: <https://drift.eur.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/To_Transition-Loorbach-2014.pdf>&#x20;

Manzini, E. (2016). Design culture and dialogic design. *Design Issues, 32*(1), 52-59.

Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. *Research policy*, *41*(6), 955-967.

Meadows, D. H. (1999). Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System. Retrieved from <http://donellameadows.org/archives/leverage-points-places-to-intervene-in-a-system/>

Meadows, D. H. (2001). Dancing with Systems. *Whole Earth Catalog, Winter 2001*. Retrieved from <http://www.wholeearth.com/issue/2106/article/2/dancing.with.systems>

Meadows, D. H., Randers, J., & Meadows, D. (2004). *Limits to growth: the 30-year update.* Vermont, USA: Chelsea Green Publishing.

Popa, F., Guillermin, M., & Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2015). A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: From complex systems theory to reflexive science. *Futures, 65*, 45-56.

Raven, R., van den Bosch, S., & Weterings, R. (2010). Transitions and strategic niche management: towards a competence kit for practitioners. *International Journal of Technology Management, 51*(1), 57-74.

Rotmans, J., Kemp, R. & van Asselt, M. (2001). More evolution than revolution. Transition management in public policy. *Foresight, 3*(1), 15-31.

Schot, J., & Geels, F. W. (2008). Strategic Niche Management and Sustainable Innovation Journeys: Theory, Findings, Research agenda, and Policy. *Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20*(5), 537-554.

Sevaldson, B. (2011). *Gigamapping: visualization for complexity and systems thinking in design.* Paper presented at the Nordic Design Research Conference, Helsinki.

Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader's framework for decision making. *Harvard Business Review, 85*(11), 68-76.

Stirling, A., Lobstein, T., & Millstone, E. (2007). Methodology for obtaining stakeholder assessments of obesity policy options in the PorGrow project. *Obesity Reviews, 8*, 17-27.


---

# Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation

If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter:

```
GET https://kems.clicknl.nl/categorieen/8.-systeemverandering/8.4-referenties.md?ask=<question>
```

The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.